We can't say anything concrete about how Dorinda Cox voted on federal government action on animal & plant extinctions
How Dorinda Cox voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government needs to support research and conservation initiatives that aim to put a stop to the current trajectory of animal and plant extinctions in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Dorinda Cox could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Dorinda Cox on this policy.
| Division | Dorinda Cox | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Mar 2023, 8:04 PM – Senate National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - in Committee - Consider biodiversity |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Dorinda Cox could have attended.
| Division | Dorinda Cox | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Feb 2023, 6:26 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Global Biodiversity Framework - End native forest logging |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Dorinda Cox has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.