How Christopher Back voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should provide more transparency of our country's political relationship with China

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Christopher Back could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Christopher Back on this policy.

Division Christopher Back Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Christopher Back could have attended.

Division Christopher Back Supporters vote

14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Christopher Back has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.