We can't say anything concrete about how Stephen Conroy voted on increasing the age pension
How Stephen Conroy voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the amount of the age pension
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Stephen Conroy could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Conroy on this policy.
| Division | Stephen Conroy | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Stephen Conroy could have attended.
| Division | Stephen Conroy | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Oct 2008, 3:38 PM – Senate Motions - Fair Go for Pensioners Coalition (FGFP) - Consider incorporating FGFP's statement of claims |
absent | Yes |
16th Aug 2007, 10:22 AM – Senate Motions - Age Pension - Increase age pension |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stephen Conroy was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.