We can't say anything concrete about how Sarah Henderson voted on Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)
How Sarah Henderson voted compared to someone who agrees that the police should be able to detain people without charge for a limited period if there is a threat of a terrorist attack or if it is likely that vital evidence will be lost after a terrorist attack takes place
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)” which Sarah Henderson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sarah Henderson on this policy.
| Division | Sarah Henderson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Nov 2023, 12:22 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
12th Aug 2021, 12:53 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Sunsetting Review and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)” which Sarah Henderson could have attended.
| Division | Sarah Henderson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Sarah Henderson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.