How Raff Ciccone voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the powers and influence of trade unions in workplace relations

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Raff Ciccone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Raff Ciccone on this policy.

Division Raff Ciccone Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Raff Ciccone could have attended.

Division Raff Ciccone Supporters vote

25th Feb 2020, 4:43 PM – Senate Motions - Workplace Relations - Greyhound Resources

absent Yes

12th Nov 2019, 1:22 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2019 - in Committee - Non-registered agreements

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Raff Ciccone was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.