We can't say anything concrete about how Raff Ciccone voted on Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)
How Raff Ciccone voted compared to someone who agrees that the police should be able to detain people without charge for a limited period if there is a threat of a terrorist attack or if it is likely that vital evidence will be lost after a terrorist attack takes place
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)” which Raff Ciccone could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Raff Ciccone on this policy.
| Division | Raff Ciccone | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Nov 2023, 12:22 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
12th Aug 2021, 12:53 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Sunsetting Review and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)” which Raff Ciccone could have attended.
| Division | Raff Ciccone | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Raff Ciccone was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.