We can't say anything concrete about how Mitch Fifield voted on limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees
How Mitch Fifield voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to a target of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees celsius above pre-industrial levels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Mitch Fifield could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield on this policy.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees ” which Mitch Fifield could have attended.
| Division | Mitch Fifield | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Jul 2019, 3:47 PM – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Protect from climate change |
absent | Yes |
26th Nov 2015, 12:26 PM – Senate Motions - Paris Climate Summit - Greens' motion |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mitch Fifield was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.