How Mitch Fifield voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should stop all investment in fossil fuels

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Mitch Fifield could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield on this policy.

Division Mitch Fifield Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Mitch Fifield could have attended.

Division Mitch Fifield Supporters vote

24th Jul 2019, 12:19 PM – Senate Future Drought Fund Bill 2019 and another - in Committee - Fossil fuels

absent Yes

6th Sep 2017, 11:22 AM – Senate Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Support for Commonwealth Entities) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Fossil fuels

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mitch Fifield was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.