We can't say anything concrete about how Michael Ronaldson voted on a character test for Australian visas
How Michael Ronaldson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should impose a character test on all non-citizens holding or applying for an Australian visa which would give the minister the power to cancel or refuse a visa under certain character-related circumstances as set out in the relevant legislation
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a character test for Australian visas” which Michael Ronaldson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Michael Ronaldson on this policy.
| Division | Michael Ronaldson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Jul 2011 – Senate Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character Test and Other Provisions) Bill 2011 - In Committee - Apply to people outside detention |
absent | Yes |
4th Jul 2011 – Senate Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character Test and Other Provisions) Bill 2011 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a character test for Australian visas” which Michael Ronaldson could have attended.
| Division | Michael Ronaldson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Michael Ronaldson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.