We can't say anything concrete about how Lidia Thorpe voted on self-governance of the territories
How Lidia Thorpe voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should not interfere in, nor intervene with, the governance of federal territories - such as the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) or the Northern Territory (NT) - and should allow those territories to create and uphold their own laws
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for self-governance of the territories” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Lidia Thorpe on this policy.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for self-governance of the territories” which Lidia Thorpe could have attended.
| Division | Lidia Thorpe | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
19th Oct 2023, 10:09 AM – Senate Australian Capital Territory Dangerous Drugs Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
17th Oct 2023, 4:37 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee; Reference - ACT Government’s Drugs of Dependence (Personal Use) Amendment Act 2022 |
absent | No |
13th Sep 2023, 9:56 AM – Senate Australian Capital Territory (Self-Government) Amendment Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | No |
24th Nov 2022, 9:26 AM – Senate Restoring Territory Rights Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Lidia Thorpe has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.