We can't say anything concrete about how Kimberley Kitching voted on increasing workplace protections
How Kimberley Kitching voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase protections for workers by, for example, ensuring there are adequate dispute resolution processes available
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections” which Kimberley Kitching could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kimberley Kitching on this policy.
| Division | Kimberley Kitching | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing workplace protections” which Kimberley Kitching could have attended.
| Division | Kimberley Kitching | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Dec 2020, 7:35 PM – Senate Motions - Workplace Safety - Industrial manslaughter |
Yes | Yes |
10th Nov 2020, 1:56 PM – Senate Economic Recovery Package (Jobmaker Hiring Credit) Amendment Bill 2020 - in Committee - Dispute resolution |
absent | Yes |
10th Nov 2020, 1:46 PM – Senate Economic Recovery Package (Jobmaker Hiring Credit) Amendment Bill 2020 - in Committee - Safeguards |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kimberley Kitching has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.