We can't say anything concrete about how Kim Carr voted on the territories being able to legalise euthanasia
How Kim Carr voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliaments of the Northern Territory and the Australian Capital Territory should have the power to legalise euthanasia (also known as voluntary assisted dying)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for the territories being able to legalise euthanasia” which Kim Carr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kim Carr on this policy.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Aug 2018, 7:03 PM – Senate Restoring Territory Rights (Assisted Suicide Legislation) Bill 2015 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for the territories being able to legalise euthanasia” which Kim Carr could have attended.
| Division | Kim Carr | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kim Carr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.