We can't say anything concrete about how Jana Stewart voted on unconventional gas mining
How Jana Stewart voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Jana Stewart could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jana Stewart on this policy.
| Division | Jana Stewart | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Jana Stewart could have attended.
| Division | Jana Stewart | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Mar 2023, 1:08 PM – Senate Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2023 - in Committee - Onshore shale gas projects |
No | No |
28th Nov 2022, 10:32 AM – Senate Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2022-2023 and two others - in Committee - Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct |
absent | No |
22nd Nov 2022, 5:39 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Gas Industry - Invest in gas |
absent | Yes |
26th Oct 2022, 3:43 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development (Underwriting New Generation Investments Program) Instrument 2021 - Disallowance |
absent | No |
26th Oct 2022, 10:59 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023 and another - in Committee - Beetaloo Basin Drilling Program |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jana Stewart has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.