Photo of Jana Stewart

We can't say anything concrete about how Jana Stewart voted on unconventional gas mining

How Jana Stewart voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Jana Stewart could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jana Stewart on this policy.

Division Jana Stewart Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Jana Stewart could have attended.

Division Jana Stewart Supporters vote

21st Jun 2023, 4:49 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct

absent No

30th Mar 2023, 1:08 PM – Senate Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2023 - in Committee - Onshore shale gas projects

No No

28th Mar 2023, 8:24 PM – Senate National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - in Committee - No financing goal, gas and native forest logging

absent No

28th Mar 2023, 8:21 PM – Senate National Reconstruction Fund Corporation Bill 2023 - in Committee - Investments

absent Yes

28th Nov 2022, 10:32 AM – Senate Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2022-2023 and two others - in Committee - Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct

absent No

22nd Nov 2022, 5:39 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Gas Industry - Invest in gas

absent Yes

26th Oct 2022, 3:43 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development (Underwriting New Generation Investments Program) Instrument 2021 - Disallowance

absent No

26th Oct 2022, 10:59 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023 and another - in Committee - Beetaloo Basin Drilling Program

absent No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Jana Stewart has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.