We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on landholders' right to say no to mining and gas exploration
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that landholders, particularly farmers, should be able to say no to mining and gas exploration on their land (in other words, they should be able to lock the gate)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for landholders' right to say no to mining and gas exploration” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for landholders' right to say no to mining and gas exploration” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Dec 2018, 4:18 PM – Senate Motions - Farmers' and Landholders' Rights - Right to refuse |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Paterson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.