We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on increasing the age pension
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the amount of the age pension
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Nov 2023, 3:38 PM – Senate Social Security and Other Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Base rate and mutual obligation requirements |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Paterson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.