How Jacinta Collins voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should create a national integrity commission similar to the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) to detect, investigate and prevent corruption across all Commonwealth departments and agencies

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission” which Jacinta Collins could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jacinta Collins on this policy.

Division Jacinta Collins Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for creating a federal Anti-Corruption Commission” which Jacinta Collins could have attended.

Division Jacinta Collins Supporters vote

15th Aug 2017, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Federal Anti-Corruption Commission - Create immediately

absent Yes

8th Feb 2017, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Federal Anti-Corruption Commission - Establish

No Yes

19th Apr 2016, 6:30 PM – Senate Motions - Anti-Corruption Commission - Create federal body

absent Yes

24th Feb 2016, 4:28 PM – Senate Committees - Establishment of a National Integrity Commission - Appointment

absent Yes

24th Nov 2015, 3:51 PM – Senate Motions - Donations to Political Parties - Ban certain political donations & establish independent corruption commission

absent Yes

13th Aug 2009, 9:53 AM – Senate Motions - Establish an Anti-Corruption Commission

No Yes

How "voted almost always against" is worked out

They Vote For You gives each vote a score based on whether the MP voted in agreement with the policy or not. These scores are then averaged with a weighting across all votes that the MP could have voted on relevant to the policy. The overall average score is then converted to a simple english language phrase based on the range of values it's within.

When an MP votes in agreement with a policy the vote is scored as 100%. When they vote against the policy it is scored as 0% and when they are absent it is scored half way between the two at 50%. The half way point effectively says "we don't know whether they are for or against this policy".

The overall agreement score for the policy is worked out by a weighted average of the scores for each vote. The weighting has been chosen so that the most important votes have a weighting 5 times that of the less important votes. Also, absent votes on less important votes are weighted 5 times less again to not penalise MPs for not attending the less important votes. Pressure of other work means MPs or Senators are not always available to vote – it does not always mean they've abstained.

Type of vote Agreement score (s) Weight (w) No of votes (n)
Most important votes MP voted with policy 100% 25 0
MP voted against policy 0% 25 0
MP absent 50% 25 0
Less important votes MP voted with policy 100% 5 0
MP voted against policy 0% 5 2
MP absent 50% 1 4

The final agreement score is a weighted average (weighted arithmetic mean) of the scores of the individual votes.

Average agreement score = sum(n×w×s) / sum(n×w) = 2.0 / 14 = 14%.

And then this average agreement score