We can't say anything concrete about how Jacinta Collins voted on re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals
How Jacinta Collins voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should, in relation to agricultural and veterinary ('agvet') chemicals, implement a mandatory scheme for the re-approval of active constituents and re-registration of chemical products to ensure their ongoing safety
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which Jacinta Collins could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jacinta Collins on this policy.
| Division | Jacinta Collins | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
28th Jun 2013, 11:08 AM – Senate Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment Bill 2013 - Third Reading - Read a third time |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for re-approving/ re-registering agvet chemicals” which Jacinta Collins could have attended.
| Division | Jacinta Collins | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Jun 2014, 12:32 PM – Senate Agricultural and Veterinary Chemicals Legislation Amendment (Removing Re-approval and Re-registration) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Read a second time |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jacinta Collins was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.