How Gavin Marshall voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should provide more transparency of our country's political relationship with China

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Gavin Marshall could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Gavin Marshall on this policy.

Division Gavin Marshall Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Gavin Marshall could have attended.

Division Gavin Marshall Supporters vote

13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee

absent Yes

14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Gavin Marshall was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.