We can't say anything concrete about how Gavin Marshall voted on increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship
How Gavin Marshall voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should provide more transparency of our country's political relationship with China
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Gavin Marshall could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Gavin Marshall on this policy.
| Division | Gavin Marshall | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Gavin Marshall could have attended.
| Division | Gavin Marshall | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee |
absent | Yes |
14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Gavin Marshall was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.