How Wendy Askew voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the powers and influence of trade unions in workplace relations

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Wendy Askew could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Wendy Askew on this policy.

Division Wendy Askew Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Wendy Askew could have attended.

Division Wendy Askew Supporters vote

25th Feb 2020, 4:43 PM – Senate Motions - Workplace Relations - Greyhound Resources

No Yes

12th Nov 2019, 1:22 PM – Senate Treasury Laws Amendment (Prohibiting Energy Market Misconduct) Bill 2019 - in Committee - Non-registered agreements

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Wendy Askew has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.