Compare how Steve Martin and Slade Brockman voted on legalising pepper spray

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for legalising pepper spray” which either Steve Martin or Slade Brockman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Steve Martin and Slade Brockman on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Steve Martin	Slade Brockman	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for legalising pepper spray” which either Steve Martin or Slade Brockman could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Steve Martin	Slade Brockman	Supporters vote
13th Feb 2019, 4:38 PM – Senate Motions - Prevention of Violence Against Women - Pepper spray	No	No	Yes
28th Jun 2018, 12:13 PM – Senate Motions - Prevention of Violence Against Women - Pepper spray, mace and tasers	No	No	Yes