Compare how Stephen Parry and Arthur Sinodinos voted on increasing restrictions on gambling
Stephen Parry
Former President Senator for Tasmania July 2014 – November 2017
Arthur Sinodinos
Former Liberal Party Senator for NSW October 2011 – November 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase restrictions on the gambling industry in order to address the issue of problem gambling
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Stephen Parry or Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Parry and Arthur Sinodinos on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Stephen Parry | Arthur Sinodinos | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
27th Mar 2018, 12:06 PM – Senate Communications Legislation Amendment (Online Content Services and Other Measures) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Gambling ads |
- | absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing restrictions on gambling” which either Stephen Parry or Arthur Sinodinos could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".