How Nick Sherry voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should set up a review of parliamentary entitlements and allowances, including legitimate expenditure, salary packages, superannuation entitlements and other allowances

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a review of parliamentary entitlements” which Nick Sherry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Sherry on this policy.

Division Nick Sherry Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a review of parliamentary entitlements” which Nick Sherry could have attended.

Division Nick Sherry Supporters vote

16th Jun 2009, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians' Entitlements - Independent Parliamentary Standards Commissioner

absent Yes

6th Sep 2006, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians’ Entitlements - Review of remuneration and entitlements

No Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Nick Sherry has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.