How Nick Sherry voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government needs to support research and conservation initiatives that aim to put a stop to the current trajectory of animal and plant extinctions in Australia

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Nick Sherry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Sherry on this policy.

Division Nick Sherry Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for federal government action on animal & plant extinctions” which Nick Sherry could have attended.

Division Nick Sherry Supporters vote

14th Sep 2011 – Senate Motions - National Threatened Species Day - Reverse biodiversity decline

absent Yes

8th Sep 2009, 3:44 PM – Senate Motions - National Threatened Species Day - Management plans

absent Yes

19th Mar 2009, 9:49 AM – Senate Motions - Protect the Swift Parrot - Deliberate Actions and Recovery Plan

absent Yes

13th Aug 2007, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - Yangtze River Dolphin - Implement management plans

absent Yes

7th Sep 2006, 10:10 AM – Senate Motions - National Threatened Species Day - Legislation to protect threatened species

absent Yes

28th Mar 2006, 3:52 PM – Senate Motions - Wedge-Tailed Eagle - Protect habitat

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nick Sherry was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.