Compare how Nick Sherry and Grant Chapman voted on a citizenship test

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a citizenship test” which either Nick Sherry or Grant Chapman could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Sherry and Grant Chapman on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Nick Sherry Grant Chapman Supporters vote

13th Aug 2007, 6:17 PM – Senate Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Testing) Bill 2007 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea

Yes Yes Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a citizenship test” which either Nick Sherry or Grant Chapman could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Nick Sherry Grant Chapman Supporters vote
no votes listed