Compare how Nick McKim and Dorinda Cox voted on increasing political transparency
![Photo of Nick McKim](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10841.jpg)
Nick McKim
Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania since August 2015
![Photo of Dorinda Cox](https://www.openaustralia.org.au/images/mpsL/10964.jpg)
Dorinda Cox
Australian Greens Senator for WA since September 2021
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Nick McKim or Dorinda Cox could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick McKim and Dorinda Cox on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Nick McKim | Dorinda Cox | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which either Nick McKim or Dorinda Cox could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".