Compare how Nick McKim and Penny Allman-Payne voted on decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels
Nick McKim
Australian Greens Senator for Tasmania since August 2015
Penny Allman-Payne
Australian Greens Senator for Queensland since May 2022
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease the subsidisation of taxpayer money into fossil fuels
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which either Nick McKim or Penny Allman-Payne could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick McKim and Penny Allman-Payne on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Nick McKim | Penny Allman-Payne | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2021, 5:51 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development - Disallow two instruments |
Yes | - | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which either Nick McKim or Penny Allman-Payne could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".