Compare how Eric Abetz and Alex Gallacher voted on increasing access to the JobKeeper Payment
Eric Abetz
Former Liberal Party Senator for Tasmania February 1994 – May 2022
Alex Gallacher
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for SA July 2011 – August 2021
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the JobKeeper payment, which is part of the federal government's response to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, should be made available to more workers, including casual workers, workers with major charities, working-visa holders who are still in the country, and workers in sectors such as Education, Disability and Local Government
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing access to the JobKeeper Payment” which either Eric Abetz or Alex Gallacher could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Eric Abetz and Alex Gallacher on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Eric Abetz | Alex Gallacher | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing access to the JobKeeper Payment” which either Eric Abetz or Alex Gallacher could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".