Catryna Bilyk has never voted on increasing access to medicinal cannabis products
How Catryna Bilyk voted compared to someone who believes that terminally ill people should be able to access medicinal cannabis products
| Division | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Nov 2019, 12:02 PM – Senate Committees - Community Affairs References Committee - Reference |
absent | Yes |
13th Jun 2017, 1:10 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow |
absent | Yes (strong) |
13th Jun 2017, 1:04 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Vote on disallowance again |
absent | Yes |
11th May 2017 – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow |
absent | Yes (strong) |
How "never voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Catryna Bilyk was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete other than that they have "never voted" on this policy.