How Catryna Bilyk voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should get rid of the Gold Travel Pass, which gives free domestic air travel to certain former politicians, such as former Prime Ministers

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for getting rid of the Gold Travel Pass” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Catryna Bilyk on this policy.

Division Catryna Bilyk Supporters vote

16th Feb 2017, 5:48 PM – Senate Parliamentary Entitlements Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Get rid of gold pass

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for getting rid of the Gold Travel Pass” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended.

Division Catryna Bilyk Supporters vote

16th Feb 2017, 7:10 PM – Senate Parliamentary Entitlements Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Gold Pass travel entitlement

absent Yes

16th Feb 2017, 6:43 PM – Senate Parliamentary Entitlements Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Prime ministers

absent Yes

16th Feb 2017, 6:18 PM – Senate Parliamentary Entitlements Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - in Committee - Former PMs and the gold pass

Yes No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Catryna Bilyk has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.