Compare how Bob Brown and Fiona Nash voted on a review of parliamentary entitlements

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a review of parliamentary entitlements” which either Bob Brown or Fiona Nash could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bob Brown and Fiona Nash on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Bob Brown	Fiona Nash	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a review of parliamentary entitlements” which either Bob Brown or Fiona Nash could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Bob Brown	Fiona Nash	Supporters vote
16th Jun 2009, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians' Entitlements - Independent Parliamentary Standards Commissioner	Yes	No	Yes
6th Sep 2006, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians’ Entitlements - Review of remuneration and entitlements	Yes	No	Yes