We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Storer voted on decreasing the gender pay gap
How Tim Storer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that reduces the gap in income between women and men and ensures both sexes are paid equally well
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Tim Storer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Storer on this policy.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Tim Storer could have attended.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
20th Sep 2018, 12:33 PM – Senate Motions - Superannuation - Gender gap + low income earners |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Tim Storer has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.