We can't say anything concrete about how Stirling Griff voted on transgender children and young people having access to gender affirming healthcare
How Stirling Griff voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should not restrict access to gender affirming healthcare for transgender people under the age of eighteen, rather they should leave healthcare matters in the hands of the professional bodies responsible for administering such healthcare (e.g., the Australian Medical Association, the Australian Psychological Society, etc.)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for transgender children and young people having access to gender affirming healthcare” which Stirling Griff could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stirling Griff on this policy.
| Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for transgender children and young people having access to gender affirming healthcare” which Stirling Griff could have attended.
| Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Jun 2021, 4:50 PM – Senate Motions - Gender Dysphoria - Treating gender diverse children |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stirling Griff was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.