How Penny Wong voted compared to someone who agrees that terminally ill people should be able to access medicinal cannabis products

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing access to medicinal cannabis products” which Penny Wong could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Penny Wong on this policy.

Division Penny Wong Supporters vote

13th Jun 2017, 1:10 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow

absent Yes

11th May 2017 – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Disallow

absent Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing access to medicinal cannabis products” which Penny Wong could have attended.

Division Penny Wong Supporters vote

8th Mar 2023, 6:27 PM – Senate Therapeutic Goods Amendment (2022 Measures No. 1) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Affordable medicinal cannabis

absent Yes

24th Nov 2022, 11:13 AM – Senate Narcotic Drugs (Licence Charges) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Increase accessibility

absent Yes

14th Nov 2019, 12:02 PM – Senate Committees - Community Affairs References Committee - Reference

absent Yes

13th Jun 2017, 1:04 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Narcotic Drugs) Regulation 2016 - Vote on disallowance again

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Penny Wong was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.