Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Nick Xenophon could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Xenophon on this policy.

Division	Nick Xenophon	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Nick Xenophon could have attended.

Division	Nick Xenophon	Supporters vote
16th Aug 2017, 12:16 PM – Senate Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Stop Adani mine	absent	No
19th Jun 2017, 3:53 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Adani's Carmichael mine	Yes	No
14th Jun 2017 – Senate Motions - Adani Carmichael Coalmine - Support	absent	Yes
17th Mar 2016, 12:39 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Support a rapid transition to clean energy	absent	No
25th Mar 2015, 5:25 PM – Senate Business - Great Barrier Reef - Galilee Basin	absent	No
2nd Mar 2015, 3:43 PM – Senate Motions - Abbot Point Coal Terminal - Transparency	absent	No
12th Feb 2015, 12:32 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Review control of Abbot Point coal terminal	absent	No
24th Nov 2014, 5:13 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Galilee Basin	absent	No

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Nick Xenophon has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.