We can't say anything concrete about how Marielle Smith voted on increasing political transparency
How Marielle Smith voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Marielle Smith could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Marielle Smith on this policy.
| Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Marielle Smith could have attended.
| Division | Marielle Smith | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2022, 3:47 PM – Senate Committees - Senators' Interests Committee - Reference |
No | Yes |
2nd Dec 2021, 11:08 AM – Senate Electoral Legislation Amendment (Annual Disclosure Equality) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Lower disclosure threshold to $1K |
absent | Yes |
30th Nov 2020, 8:05 PM – Senate Appropriation Bill (No. 1) 2020-2021 - in Committee - ANAO funding |
absent | Yes |
24th Feb 2020, 4:11 PM – Senate Motions - Parliament - Transparency |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Marielle Smith has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.