We can't say anything concrete about how Kerrynne Liddle voted on increasing political transparency
How Kerrynne Liddle voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase transparency requirements for political parties (for example, requiring full and prompt disclosure of any political donations on easy-to-search public websites)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Kerrynne Liddle could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kerrynne Liddle on this policy.
| Division | Kerrynne Liddle | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing political transparency” which Kerrynne Liddle could have attended.
| Division | Kerrynne Liddle | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Oct 2023, 4:03 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentary Standards - Lobbyists |
absent | Yes |
22nd Mar 2023, 3:47 PM – Senate Documents - Leader of the Government in the Senate - Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | Yes |
3rd Aug 2022, 3:47 PM – Senate Committees - Senators' Interests Committee - Reference |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Kerrynne Liddle was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.