We can't say anything concrete about how Karen Grogan voted on unconventional gas mining
How Karen Grogan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Karen Grogan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Karen Grogan on this policy.
| Division | Karen Grogan | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Karen Grogan could have attended.
| Division | Karen Grogan | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Nov 2021, 1:04 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development (Beetaloo Cooperative Drilling Program) Instrument 2021 - Disallowance |
absent | No |
24th Nov 2021, 6:12 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Climate Change - Statement on Glasgow Climate Pact |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Karen Grogan was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.