How David Fawcett voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should legalise the importation of pepper spray and encourage state governments to legalise carrying pepper spray - especially by women - to deter and defend against attacks

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for legalising pepper spray” which David Fawcett could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Fawcett on this policy.

Division David Fawcett Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for legalising pepper spray” which David Fawcett could have attended.

Division David Fawcett Supporters vote

13th Feb 2019, 4:38 PM – Senate Motions - Prevention of Violence Against Women - Pepper spray

absent Yes

28th Jun 2018, 12:13 PM – Senate Motions - Prevention of Violence Against Women - Pepper spray, mace and tasers

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case David Fawcett was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.