Compare how Anne McEwen and Joe Ludwig voted on a review of parliamentary entitlements

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a review of parliamentary entitlements” which either Anne McEwen or Joe Ludwig could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne McEwen and Joe Ludwig on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Anne McEwen Joe Ludwig Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a review of parliamentary entitlements” which either Anne McEwen or Joe Ludwig could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Anne McEwen Joe Ludwig Supporters vote

16th Jun 2009, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians' Entitlements - Independent Parliamentary Standards Commissioner

No No Yes

6th Sep 2006, 4:01 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians’ Entitlements - Review of remuneration and entitlements

No No Yes