We can't say anything concrete about how Susan McDonald voted on nuclear energy
How Susan McDonald voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support nuclear energy generation in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for nuclear energy” which Susan McDonald could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Susan McDonald on this policy.
| Division | Susan McDonald | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for nuclear energy” which Susan McDonald could have attended.
| Division | Susan McDonald | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Jul 2024, 5:41 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Nuclear Energy - Support nuclear energy |
absent | Yes |
26th Jun 2024, 4:45 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Nuclear Energy - Recognise and welcome |
absent | Yes |
13th Sep 2023, 4:27 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Nuclear Energy - End prohibition |
absent | Yes |
11th Feb 2020, 4:15 PM – Senate Motions - Nuclear Energy - Australia as a nuclear-free zone |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Susan McDonald has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.