Compare how Sue Boyce and John Faulkner voted on protecting the Great Barrier Reef
Sue Boyce
Former Liberal Party Senator for Queensland April 2007 – June 2014
John Faulkner
Former Australian Labor Party Senator for NSW April 1989 – February 2015
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should make laws and regulations that protect and conserve the health of the Great Barrier Reef for future generations
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which either Sue Boyce or John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Boyce and John Faulkner on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Sue Boyce | John Faulkner | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for protecting the Great Barrier Reef” which either Sue Boyce or John Faulkner could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".