Compare how Sue Boyce and John Faulkner voted on recognising local government in the Constitution

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which either Sue Boyce or John Faulkner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Boyce and John Faulkner on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Boyce	John Faulkner	Supporters vote
24th Jun 2013, 8:19 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Third Reading - Pass the bill	Yes	Yes	Yes
24th Jun 2013, 8:11 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea	Yes	Yes	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which either Sue Boyce or John Faulkner could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Boyce	John Faulkner	Supporters vote
7th Sep 2006, 9:56 AM – Senate Motions - Local Government in Australia - Referendum	-	Yes	Yes