Compare how Sue Boyce and David Feeney voted on voluntary student union fees

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which either Sue Boyce or David Feeney could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Sue Boyce and David Feeney on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Boyce	David Feeney	Supporters vote
11th Oct 2011 – Senate Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Student Services and Amenities) Bill 2010 - Third Reading - Read a third time	No	absent	No
18th Aug 2009, 1:40 PM – Senate Higher Education Legislation Amendment (Student Services and Amenities, and Other Measures) Bill 2009 - Third Reading - Read a third time	absent	Yes	No

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which either Sue Boyce or David Feeney could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Sue Boyce	David Feeney	Supporters vote
25th Sep 2008, 9:45 AM – Senate Motions - Voluntary Student Unionism - Agree to motion	No	No	No