We can't say anything concrete about how Russell Trood voted on live animal export
How Russell Trood voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow live animal export and place minimal restrictions on it
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for live animal export” which Russell Trood could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Russell Trood on this policy.
| Division | Russell Trood | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for live animal export” which Russell Trood could have attended.
| Division | Russell Trood | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Jun 2011 – Senate Motions — Live Animal Exports — Move to re—establish live export with Indonesia |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Russell Trood was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.