We can't say anything concrete about how Paul Scarr voted on market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity
How Paul Scarr voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should address the destruction of Australia's biodiversity by commodifying the protection of natural environments (e.g., issuing certificates or credits for biodiversity protection that can then be sold on the market)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity” which Paul Scarr could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Paul Scarr on this policy.
| Division | Paul Scarr | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
5th Dec 2023, 8:59 PM – Senate Nature Repair Market Bill 2023 and Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity” which Paul Scarr could have attended.
| Division | Paul Scarr | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Paul Scarr was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.