Nature Repair Market Bill 2023 and another - Second Reading - Agree with the bills' main idea
Passed by a small majority
No rebellions 91% attendance
Division last edited 23rd Feb 2024 by mackay staff
The majority voted in favour of a motion to agree with the remaining stages of the bills (as amended) and so pass them in the Senate. In other words, they voted to read the bills for a third time. They will now be sent back to the House of Representatives, where our MPs will decide on whether they agree with the Senate amendments.
According to the bills digest summary:
(1) Clause 1, page 1 (line 16), omit “ Market ”.
(2) Page 4 (line 21) to page 245 (line 16), omit “Nature Repair Market Committee” (wherever occurring), substitute “Nature Repair Committee”.
(3) Clause 7, page 11 (after line 8), after the definition of engage in conduct , insert:
environmental offsetting measure includes, but is not limited to, a measure to offset or compensate for the impacts of an action or project (however described) on the environment that is:
(a) required as a condition of an approval, licence or permit (however described) under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory; or
(b) directly financed from a fund into which money is paid as a condition of an environmental approval, licence or permit (however described) under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory; or
(c) undertaken as required or agreed to under a penalty or enforceable undertaking imposed or accepted under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory.
(4) Clause 7, page 11 (lines 9 to 13), omit the definition of environmental offsetting purpose , substitute:
environmental offsetting purpose means the purpose of meeting an environmental offsetting requirement (however described) under a law of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory including through an environmental offsetting measure.
(5) Clause 68, page 95 (lines 18 to 20), omit subclause (1A).
(6) Clause 70, page 97 (lines 2 to 8), omit subclause (3), substitute:
(3) A biodiversity certificate must set out such matters (if any) as are specified in the rules.
(7) Clause 70B, page 97 (line 25) to page 98 (line 13), omit the clause.
(8) Clause 71, page 98 (line 20), omit “or 70B”.
(9) Clause 76A, page 100 (lines 16 to 22), omit the clause, substitute:
76A Biodiversity certificates not to be used for environmental offsetting purpose
(1) A biodiversity certificate must not be used for an environmental offsetting purpose.
(2) This section has effect despite any other provision of this Act or any other law of the Commonwealth, or a State or Territory.
(3) To avoid doubt, section 225 (Concurrent operation of State and Territory laws) does not apply to this section.
(10) Clause 164, page 187 (lines 12 to 22), omit paragraphs (1)(da) and (db).
(11) Clause 212, page 234 (lines 20 and 21), omit paragraph (fa).
According to the supplementary explanatory memorandum (which is a political document that was prepared by the Government itself):
The proposed amendments to the Bill would amend the EPBC Act to:
expand the scope of the water trigger to apply to all forms of unconventional gas development (rather than coal seam gas development) including activities involving unconventional gas (unconventional gas production) (by drilling, hydraulic fracturing, or other means), including from coal seams, shale rock, tight reservoirs, and any other sources prescribed by regulation. The water trigger will continue to apply to large coal mining development.
expand the scope of the Independent Expert Scientific Committee to provide advice on EPBC Act approvals involving unconventional gas developments, in addition to coal seam gas and large coal mining developments.
amend the name of the Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Coal Seam Gas and Large Coal Mining Development (IESC) to reflect the broadened remit (to Independent Expert Scientific Committee on Unconventional Gas Development and Large Coal Mining Development).
define what is meant by an unconventional gas development and unconventional gas production and allow for further sources to be added in regulations if there are emerging technologies that may need to be captured in future.
provide clarity in relation to the application of the expanded water trigger giving proponents greater certainty through explicitly excluding projects that are:
currently in production as approved under a Commonwealth, state or territory law or is a development that has permanently ceased extraction or production or where post-production has permanently ceased,
have an existing approval under Part 9 of the EPBC Act or notice of a proposed approval decision, or
have previously been determined to not need an approval under the EPBC Act (i.e. the action is not a controlled action, not a controlled action particular manner)
provide that relevant projects currently undergoing EPBC Act assessment (i.e. have been determined to be controlled actions under the EPBC Act but have not yet been approved) will need to be assessed for impacts on water resources.
Nobody rebelled against their party.
Party | Votes | |
---|---|---|
Australian Greens (64% turnout) | 7 Yes – 0 No | |
Penny Allman-Payne Queensland | Yes | |
Sarah Hanson-Young SA | Yes | |
Nick McKim Tasmania | Yes | |
Barbara Pocock SA | Yes | |
David Shoebridge NSW | Yes | |
Larissa Waters Queensland | Yes | |
Peter Whish-Wilson Tasmania | Yes | |
Dorinda Cox WA | Absent | |
Mehreen Faruqi NSW | Absent | |
Janet Rice Victoria | Absent | |
Jordon Steele-John WA | Absent | |
Australian Labor Party (72% turnout) | 18 Yes – 0 No | |
Tim Ayres NSW | Yes | |
Catryna Bilyk Tasmania | Yes | |
Anthony Chisholm Queensland | Yes | |
Katy Gallagher ACT | Yes | |
Nita Green Queensland | Yes | |
Karen Grogan SA | Yes | |
Jenny McAllister NSW | Yes | |
Malarndirri McCarthy NT | Yes | |
Fatima Payman WA | Yes | |
Helen Polley Tasmania | Yes | |
Louise Pratt WA | Yes | |
Tony Sheldon NSW | Yes | |
Marielle Smith SA | Yes | |
Glenn Sterle WA | Yes | |
Jana Stewart Victoria | Yes | |
Anne Urquhart Tasmania | Yes | |
Jess Walsh Victoria | Yes | |
Murray Watt Queensland | Yes | |
Carol Brown Tasmania | Absent | |
Raff Ciccone Victoria | Absent | |
Patrick Dodson WA | Absent | |
Don Farrell SA | Absent | |
Deborah O'Neill NSW | Absent | |
Linda White Victoria | Absent | |
Penny Wong SA | Absent | |
Jacinta Nampijinpa Price NT Country Liberal Party | No | |
Andrew McLachlan SA Deputy President | Absent | |
David Pocock ACT Independent | No | |
Lidia Thorpe Victoria Independent | Absent | |
David Van Victoria Independent | Absent | |
Jacqui Lambie Network (100% turnout) | 2 Yes – 0 No | |
Jacqui Lambie Tasmania | Yes | |
Tammy Tyrrell Tasmania | Yes | |
Liberal National Party (100% turnout) | 0 Yes – 2 No | |
Matthew Canavan Queensland | No | |
James McGrath Queensland | No | |
Liberal Party (65% turnout) | 0 Yes – 15 No | |
Alex Antic SA | No | |
Wendy Askew Tasmania | No | |
Slade Brockman WA | No | |
Jonathon Duniam Tasmania | No | |
David Fawcett SA | No | |
Sarah Henderson Victoria | No | |
Jane Hume Victoria | No | |
Maria Kovacic NSW | No | |
Kerrynne Liddle SA | No | |
Matt O'Sullivan WA | No | |
Gerard Rennick Queensland | No | |
Linda Reynolds WA | No | |
Anne Ruston SA | No | |
Dave Sharma NSW | No | |
Dean Smith WA | No | |
Simon Birmingham SA | Absent | |
Andrew Bragg NSW | Absent | |
Michaelia Cash WA | Absent | |
Claire Chandler Tasmania | Absent | |
Richard Colbeck Tasmania | Absent | |
Hollie Hughes NSW | Absent | |
James Paterson Victoria | Absent | |
Paul Scarr Queensland | Absent | |
National Party (100% turnout) | 0 Yes – 4 No | |
Ross Cadell NSW | No | |
Perin Davey NSW | No | |
Susan McDonald Queensland | No | |
Bridget McKenzie Victoria | No | |
Pauline Hanson's One Nation Party (50% turnout) | 0 Yes – 1 No | |
Malcolm Roberts Queensland | No | |
Pauline Hanson Queensland | Absent | |
Sue Lines WA President | Yes | |
Ralph Babet Victoria United Australia Party | No | |
Totals (70% turnout) | 28 Yes – 25 No |
Turnout is the percentage of members eligible to vote that did vote.