We can't say anything concrete about how Nita Green voted on Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)
How Nita Green voted compared to someone who agrees that the police should be able to detain people without charge for up to 14 days if there is a threat of a terrorist attack or if it is likely that vital evidence will be lost after a terrorist attack takes place
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)” which Nita Green could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nita Green on this policy.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
12th Aug 2021, 12:53 PM – Senate Counter-Terrorism Legislation Amendment (Sunsetting Review and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Preventative Detention Orders (PDOs)” which Nita Green could have attended.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nita Green was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.