We can't say anything concrete about how Nita Green voted on an Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC)
How Nita Green voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be an Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC) to monitor workplace relations in the building and construction industry
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for an Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC)” which Nita Green could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nita Green on this policy.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Nov 2022, 6:46 PM – Senate Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | No |
7th Sep 2022, 6:12 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Code for the Tendering and Performance of Building Work Amendment Instrument 2022 - Disallow |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for an Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC)” which Nita Green could have attended.
| Division | Nita Green | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Nov 2022, 6:34 PM – Senate Fair Work Legislation Amendment (Secure Jobs, Better Pay) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Withdraw |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nita Green was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.