How Matthew Canavan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that reduces the gap in income between women and men and ensures both sexes are paid equally well

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Matthew Canavan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Matthew Canavan on this policy.

Division Matthew Canavan Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which Matthew Canavan could have attended.

Division Matthew Canavan Supporters vote

23rd Jun 2021, 4:14 PM – Senate Motions - Discrimination - Against affirmative action

absent No

8th Dec 2020, 4:53 PM – Senate Motions - Women's Economic Security - Retirement incomes

No Yes

26th Aug 2020, 4:02 PM – Senate Motions - Superannuation - Inequality

absent Yes

20th Sep 2018, 12:33 PM – Senate Motions - Superannuation - Gender gap + low income earners

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Matthew Canavan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.