How Mark Furner voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for public transport within and between Australia's major urban centres and prioritise it over funding for private transport infrastructure projects

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for public transport” which Mark Furner could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mark Furner on this policy.

Division Mark Furner Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for public transport” which Mark Furner could have attended.

Division Mark Furner Supporters vote

12th May 2010, 4:09 PM – Senate Motions - High Speed Rail Network - Feasibility study

absent Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Mark Furner was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.